WIP Again (continued)

ianpatt · Post by **ianpatt** » Tue Apr 09, 2002 11:02 pm

Tourniquet wrote:With cheats that prompt the user for a value, you can ignore the range imposed on it by just typing a different value using the num keys.

Fixed.

ianpatt · Post by **ianpatt** » Wed Apr 10, 2002 1:23 am

Bugfinder wrote:I tried with cheat 073 and also the arrows goes beyond the range. 071 goes only until the end then returns to the first value.

Fixed.

Bugfinder wrote:Also auto speed increasing doesn't work there either.

Fixed with previous fix to code_read_hex_async.

ianpatt · Post by **ianpatt** » Wed Apr 10, 2002 3:16 am

Binaries uploading right now; should be up in ~6 minutes.

New source/binary:
source
binary
mame32 binary

kelvSYC · Post by **kelvSYC** » Wed Apr 10, 2002 3:57 am

Wow. So many updates in so few days... it's frustrating when you have to keep track of the latest and play EV Nova at the same time...

PS. The Polaris ending in EVN is so tragic...

Bugfinder · Post by **Bugfinder** » Wed Apr 10, 2002 4:48 am

ianpatt wrote:
Bugfinder wrote:This was tried in classic mode: I select a cheat search for Lives, then when I continue search the same value is displayed on Timers - it used to stay in 0 until this specific option was changed.
Didn't think this was a problem. Easy to fix anyway - fixed.

Not really yet; start a lives search with any number different than 0, then continue to search. The hex value at left (on timers) will stay the same. If you go on below 0, it will update accordingly but if you go up, it will stay just like the first value in lives.

The others are fixed. Thanks Ian.

ianpatt · Post by **ianpatt** » Wed Apr 10, 2002 5:22 am

Bugfinder wrote:
ianpatt wrote:
Bugfinder wrote:This was tried in classic mode: I select a cheat search for Lives, then when I continue search the same value is displayed on Timers - it used to stay in 0 until this specific option was changed.
Didn't think this was a problem. Easy to fix anyway - fixed.
Not really yet; start a lives search with any number different than 0, then continue to search. The hex value at left (on timers) will stay the same. If you go on below 0, it will update accordingly but if you go up, it will stay just like the first value in lives.

Sorry - I found/fixed that right before uploading but forgot to update the zip file.

ianpatt · Post by **ianpatt** » Wed Apr 10, 2002 5:30 am

I think all the major bugs are out of the code now. So, unless anyone finds anything major, I'm going to submit it tomorrow.

There are some small patches I need to make to the MAME core to make the message boxes disappear even when paused - I'll upload final binaries and source later today.

edit:

Uploading now.

New source/binary:
source
binary
mame32 binary

Bugfinder · Post by **Bugfinder** » Wed Apr 10, 2002 8:36 am

ianpatt wrote:
Bugfinder wrote:Question 1: can I delete a complete memory region when checking results or only individual addresses? The only way to do this is removing that memory region in the next search, right? In this case I'm forced to do another search, which might delete some important addresses. Do you think it's okay to have shift+ "d" to delete entire memory regions from results?
Added.

Can you delete memory regions by pressing shift + d over it? I tried here and couldn't make it work

ianpatt wrote: Sorry - I found/fixed that right before uploading but forgot to update the zip file.

Hey that's fine

I'm sure tomorrow you'll submit the engine.

ianpatt · Post by **ianpatt** » Wed Apr 10, 2002 8:55 am

Bugfinder wrote:Can you delete memory regions by pressing shift + d over it? I tried here and couldn't make it work

Works fine here... hmm. Most likely you wanted this added to the "view results" dialog - I added it to the "select search regions" dialog. It's easy to add to both, so it works in both dialogs now.

Bugfinder · Post by **Bugfinder** » Wed Apr 10, 2002 3:27 pm

ianpatt wrote:
Bugfinder wrote:Can you delete memory regions by pressing shift + d over it? I tried here and couldn't make it work
Most likely you wanted this added to the "view results" dialog - I added it to the "select search regions" dialog. It's easy to add to both, so it works in both dialogs now.

Yes! That's what I was originally expecting, to remove them from the "view results". I tried on select memeory areas (didn't think of that) and it works. But it's more practical now that you added to "view results". Thank you.

stephh · Post by **stephh** » Wed Apr 10, 2002 11:27 pm

ianpatt wrote: I think all the major bugs are out of the code now. So, unless anyone finds anything major, I'm going to submit it tomorrow.

Everything that I've tested is OK now

Go and submit your great work ...

Steph from The Ultimate Patchers

Visit

The Ultimate Patchers' site

ianpatt · Post by **ianpatt** » Thu Apr 11, 2002 12:57 am

OK - submitted.

I'd like to thank everyone for your help with this - all the bug reports/feature requests/etc. have been invaluable. I'm sure you're all just happy I finally got it finished and submitted anyway...

kelvSYC · Post by **kelvSYC** » Thu Apr 11, 2002 1:39 am

Yeah, great job Ian. Now it's time to take a big break...

And now I have to remember that now I have to use the keypad 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 to enter A, B, C, D, E, and F.

Bugfinder · Post by **Bugfinder** » Thu Apr 11, 2002 2:11 am

ianpatt wrote:OK - submitted.

I'd like to thank everyone for your help with this - all the bug reports/feature requests/etc. have been invaluable. I'm sure you're all just happy I finally got it finished and submitted anyway...

You're welcome, and thank you too! Sure I'm happy to have contributed in my humble capacity

I hope 0.60 doesn't take too long to appear.

By the way, the last source update you did about deleting memory regions in "view results" is already up or only in the submitted source?

stephh · Post by **stephh** » Thu Apr 11, 2002 5:29 am

ianpatt wrote: OK - submitted.

I'd like to thank everyone for your help with this - all the bug reports/feature requests/etc. have been invaluable. I'm sure you're all just happy I finally got it finished and submitted anyway...

You can't imagine the GREAT gift you gave Pugsy and I for our birthdays !

Steph from The Ultimate Patchers

Visit

The Ultimate Patchers' site

ianpatt · Post by **ianpatt** » Thu Apr 11, 2002 5:31 am

kelvSYC wrote:And now I have to remember that now I have to use the keypad 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 to enter A, B, C, D, E, and F.

That's fixed in the final source.

ianpatt · Post by **ianpatt** » Thu Apr 11, 2002 5:35 am

Bugfinder wrote:By the way, the last source update you did about deleting memory regions in "view results" is already up or only in the submitted source?

I've uploaded the final source to the server. Don't remember if the fix was there before, but it's there now.

Post by **Pugsy** » Sat Apr 13, 2002 12:59 am

Thank You

Bugfinder · Post by **Bugfinder** » Sat Apr 13, 2002 8:31 pm

I no longer receive "conflict address" warnings. I can set both cheats that work in the same address at same time.

Example:

Code: Select all

1942:0:E164:00:000:Always have Normal Fire
1942:0:E164:80:000:Always have Power Up Fire

Both are accepted.

ianpatt · Post by **ianpatt** » Sat Apr 13, 2002 9:16 pm

Bugfinder wrote:I no longer receive "conflict address" warnings. I can set both cheats that work in the same address at same time.

Yes. Conflict checking became much more difficult when the cheat format changed; I'll probably add it back later.

Emulator Cheats

WIP Again (continued)

Re: Using numeric keys?

Re: Bug in cheat engine?

Re: Bug in cheat engine?

Final Release

I don't know if it's me, so...

Re: I don't know if it's me, so...

Re: I don't know if it's me, so...

Re: Final Release

w00t, submitted

Re: w00t, submitted

Re: w00t, submitted

Re: w00t, submitted

Thank You Ian

Does this happen to you?

Re: Does this happen to you?